On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released their monthly jobs report, showing a preliminary estimate of 254,000 net new jobs in the American economy in September. The much-better-than-expected result begs the question – How believable is it? Here’s a look at revisions to the monthly jobs report by month for the initial release, and the first and second revisions.

The Monthly Jobs Numbers

The following is the monthly jobs for the initial reading (second column), first revision, second revision, and the difference from the original reading to the second (or first if there is only one revision) revision. On net, the average revision is a drop from the initial reading of 21,000. In 2024, the average difference has been downward by 36,000.

Looking at the Revisions

The first reading typically gives markets and policymakers an early snapshot of employment trends. However, as more accurate data becomes available, the revisions can be significant, as shown.

Initial vs Revised Readings

The data shows both upward and downward adjustments between the initial and revised readings. In some months, like March 2023, the revisions were significant, with the final estimate being much lower than the initial one. In other months, like April 2023, the revised estimates actually increased compared to the original report.

Differences Between Initial and Final Estimates

One key takeaway from the data is the magnitude of the difference between initial readings and final revisions. The difference from the original reading, shown in the second chart, highlights how much job estimates can change over time. In January 2023, the number of jobs was revised down by 35,000 from the initial estimate, while in April, the revisions added 25,000 jobs to the original report. The trend, though, is nowhere near positive, and, as shown, have gotten increasingly negative. One may be well served considering recent jobs numbers with a bit of skepticism.

Conclusion

Understanding these revisions is crucial, especially when analyzing short-term trends in employment. Revisions often reflect the evolving picture of the economy and can sometimes be more informative than the initial reading. Tracking these changes over time can help paint a clearer picture of labor market trends and guide better decision-making by economists, policymakers, and businesses.

Judging by recent revisions in the jobs market counts relative to 2023, one may be well-served being a little more cautious than normal in assuming high monthly jobs numbers are realistic.

{ 0 comments }

The Initial Public Offering (IPO) market is a key indicator of economic health and business confidence. Companies often choose to go public when they expect favorable market conditions and investor appetite for new opportunities. One key macroeconomic factor that can have a significant influence on IPO activity is the Federal Funds Effective Rate (FFER), the interest rate at which banks sometimes borrow. This rate not only impacts the cost of borrowing but also influences overall liquidity in the market.

Analyzing data from 2000 to 2023, there is a notable correlation between the FFER and the number of IPOs each year. The data shows how changes in the interest rate coincide with fluctuations in IPO numbers, reflecting the direct and indirect effects the rate has on financial market conditions and corporate financing decisions.

The Link Between Interest Rates and IPO Activity

When interest rates are high, borrowing costs increase, and companies may find it more expensive to finance operations, expansions, or new ventures. This could deter companies from going public as the appetite for risk among investors diminishes, leading to fewer IPOs. On the other hand, when the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates, liquidity increases, making it easier for businesses to borrow money at lower costs, which can fuel more aggressive growth strategies, including going public.

From the early 2000s, a clear pattern emerges where the number of IPOs peaked in 2000 with 397 IPOs, coinciding with a Federal Funds Effective Rate of approximately 6.24% (annual average). However, following the burst of the dot-com bubble and the subsequent recession, both the IPO numbers and the FFER began to drop sharply. By 2001, the FFER fell to 3.88%, and the number of IPOs decreased to 141. This declining trend in IPO activity continued until 2003, when the rate reached a low of 1.12%, with only 148 IPOs during that year.

As the rate remained low for an extended period, businesses took advantage of cheaper credit, leading to a recovery in IPOs. By 2004, the number of IPOs rose to 314, while the FFER was still relatively low at 1.35%.

The Recession’s Impact and Recent Trends

The Great Recession of 2008 had a profound impact on both the financial markets and the IPO landscape. In response to the economic crisis, the Federal Reserve slashed interest rates to near-zero levels to stimulate the economy. Between 2008 and 2015, the Federal Funds Rate remained exceptionally low, which contributed to a boom in IPOs in the years following the recession as liquidity was plentiful and investor confidence rebounded.

In recent years, however, the relationship between the Federal Funds Rate and IPO activity has evolved. While lower rates still provide favorable conditions for companies to go public, other factors such as technological advancements, private funding options, and economic policy also play important roles in influencing IPO decisions.

Summing Up

Overall, will the recent rate drops provide a boost to IPOs in the coming months? Maybe, but a few months of time is likely too short. With that said, if the Federal Reserve continues on its path of lowering interest rates, we may just she another boom in IPOs.

{ 0 comments }

In recent years, European megafunds have emerged as a dominant force in the private equity (PE) landscape, marking a notable shift in the fundraising and investment dynamics across Europe. Despite facing macroeconomic challenges, European megafunds have been setting new fundraising records, reflecting the growing appeal of large-scale investments within the region. The second installment of PitchBook’s analyst note on the rise of European megafunds delves into the factors driving this trend, comparing megafunds to non-megafunds in terms of timelines, step-ups, and overall performance. Here’s a review according to a recent report out of Pitchbook.

Fundraising Trends and Shorter Timelines

One of the most notable developments is the reduced time between fundraising rounds for megafunds. Between 2013 and 2024, the median time between fundraising cycles for European megafunds decreased from 5.4 years to 3.3 years. Non-megafunds followed a similar trend, though at a slower pace, with the median dropping from 5.5 years to 3.7 years. This acceleration highlights the growing investor confidence in large funds and their ability to attract capital more quickly than smaller funds.

Step-ups, or the increase in capital raised from one fund to the next, have also been a key feature of megafund growth. European megafunds have consistently outpaced non-megafunds in terms of step-ups, peaking at a median of 1.8x between 2019 and 2021. However, recent economic conditions, including rising interest rates and tightening credit markets, have caused step-ups to moderate, with megafunds experiencing a slight decline to 1.6x in the 2022-2024 period. Non-megafunds, on the other hand, have maintained a steady step-up rate of 1.4x.

Longer Fundraising Timelines

Interestingly, despite their ability to raise large sums of capital, the time to close a megafund has increased in recent years. In the 2022-2024 period, the median time for megafunds to close increased to 15 months, up from nine months in 2019-2021. This increase is attributed to the more complex nature of megafund fundraising, which often involves specialized investor relations teams and intricate fundraising strategies. Additionally, lower capital availability in recent years has further extended the time needed to close both megafunds and non-megafunds.

Cash Flow Divergence and Capital Deployment

One of the key differentiators between megafunds and non-megafunds since 2020 has been their cash flow profiles. While non-megafunds have maintained positive net cash flows, megafunds have turned cash flow negative. This divergence is largely due to the higher capital contributions required by megafunds compared to their distributions. Since 2020, European megafunds have returned approximately €250 billion to limited partners (LPs), representing 55% of total European PE fund distributions, while accounting for at least 67% of contributions. This imbalance has resulted in negative cash flows for megafunds, underscoring the pressure on these funds to deploy capital effectively in the current high-interest-rate environment.

Performance of European Megafunds

The performance of European megafunds has been a topic of debate, with some suggesting that larger funds underperform due to the challenges of scale. However, PitchBook’s data reveals that European megafunds have generally outperformed their smaller counterparts over longer time horizons. Over a 15-year period ending in 2023, megafunds achieved annualized internal rates of return (IRRs) of 12.7%, compared to 11.4% for non-megafunds. On a quarterly basis, megafunds also outperformed non-megafunds, with a marginal but consistent advantage.

Despite these positive returns, the dispersion of performance remains a key consideration for investors. Megafunds tend to offer more stable and predictable outcomes, with less extreme variations in performance between the top and bottom quartiles. This stability is attractive to LPs, particularly those seeking lower-risk investments with predictable returns.

Conclusion

Overall, the rise of European megafunds represents a notable evolution in the private equity landscape. These funds have demonstrated their ability to raise large sums of capital quickly, potentially outperform over long horizons, and offer stable returns. However, the challenges of managing such large pools of capital, particularly in a tightening economic environment, will continue to shape their future performance. As European megafunds continue to grow, they are likely to remain a focal point of private equity fundraising and investment strategies in the region.

{ 0 comments }

Looking at the Venture Capital Landscape Across Europe

August 27, 2024

Every quarter, private equity data provider Pitchbook offers a glimpse of the venture capital markets in Europe. Here’s a review. Summary Overall, this quarter’s report underscores the ongoing recovery in valuations, driven largely by favorable interest rates and the growing influence of AI across various investment stages. However, the market still grapples with uncertainties, particularly […]

Read the full article →

A Look at Pitchbook’s Global Manager Performance Tables

August 14, 2024

Every year, private equity data provider Pitchbook releases its accounting of the best global managers. This year’s 2023 report provides a fascinating review of the landscape. Here’s a review. Methodology and Scoring Overall, the 2023 PitchBook Global Manager Performance Score League Tables report provides a comprehensive evaluation of private capital fund strategies worldwide. The report […]

Read the full article →

An Update on the Global M&A Picture

July 30, 2024

Global M&A Activity Rebounds in Q2 2024 Every now and then we do a review of the global mergers and acquisitions picture (M&A). This is that reviewed based on a recent report out of private equity data provider Pitchbook. The second quarter of 2024 marked a significant turning point for the global M&A market. After […]

Read the full article →

Performance Analysis of Private Markets in North America: Q4 2023 and Preliminary Q1 2024 Insights

July 16, 2024

Private equity data provider Pitchbook recently released their Q4 2023 benchmarks report, with preliminary data for Q1 2024. It provides a fascinating review on the state of the private equity and venture capital markets. Here’s a review. Expanded Benchmarks and Methodology PitchBook has expanded its benchmarks to include additional slices based on fund strategy and […]

Read the full article →

The Global Private Capital Fundraising Landscape

July 2, 2024

The 2024 Global Private Capital Fundraising Report by SS&C Intralinks reveals a landscape characterized by resilience and strategic adaptation in response to economic fluctuations and market challenges. In 2023, global fundraising surpassed expectations, breaking the $1 trillion threshold with $1.3 trillion raised across 3,411 funds. This marked a shift from the exuberance of the pandemic […]

Read the full article →

Private Equity’s Middle Market is Alive and Well

June 18, 2024

Every quarter private equity data provider Pitchbook releases their accounting of the different market segments. Here’s a review of what they found for private equity’s (PE) middle market. Executive Summary In Q1 2024, US PE middle-market dealmaking showed a slight improvement over Q1 2023, following a peak of activity in Q4 2023. The increase in […]

Read the full article →

The Deceptive Nature of Early Stage Valuations

June 4, 2024

In the fast-paced world of startups and venture capital, early stage valuations often serve as a tantalizing yet sometimes deceptive beacon. While they provide a snapshot of a startup’s perceived value, these valuations are rife with assumptions, inflated expectations, and strategic maneuvering that can sometimes mislead founders, investors, and the market. Sometimes when put to […]

Read the full article →
Real Time Web Analytics